Rare Element Resources
Bear Lodge Project
Canadian NI 43-101 Technical Report
October 9
th
, 2014
10135-200-46 - Rev. 0
xviii
Figure 13.14 - PP1 Precipitation efficiency vs. Oxalic Acid Dosage (g/L feed solution).
Excess oxalates were not recycled. ............................................................ 13-40
Figure 13.15 - Pilot Precipitation Apparatus at SGS – 2013 ............................................... 13-42
Figure 13.16 - Pilot Distillation Column at SGS................................................................... 13-44
Figure 13.17 - Feed HCl acid to distillation column (recoverable)....................................... 13-46
Figure 14.1 - Domains and Trends for Resource Estimation ................................................ 14-3
Figure 14.2 - Typical Cross Sections through the Oxidation State Model............................. 14-5
Figure 14.3 - Core Recovery Distribution by Oxidation Type .............................................. 14-11
Figure 14.4 - TREO vs FMR Relationship by Oxidation Type............................................. 14-12
Figure 14.5 - TREO Grade for OxCa Samples Grouped by Core Recovery....................... 14-13
Figure 14.6 - TREO Grade for Oxide Samples Grouped by Core Recovery ...................... 14-13
Figure 14.7 - TREO Grade for Low-Grade Oxide Samples Grouped by Core Recovery ... 14-13
Figure 14.8 - TREO Grade for Tran+Sulf Samples Grouped by Core Recovery ................ 14-13
Figure 14.9 - Lognormal grade cumulative frequency distributions and histograms
for TREO by OreZONE – Oxides and OxCa Composites ............................. 14-19
Figure 14.10 - Log-transformed Histograms for TREO, FMR, Iron Oxide,
Manganese Oxide, Thorium and Uranium........................................................................... 14-20
Figure 14.11 - Log-transformed Histograms for Calcium Oxide by Ore Zone and
Oxide Type ................................................................................................... 14-21
Figure 14.12 - Experimental Variograms and Models for the OreZONE Indicator Flag...... 14-26
Figure 14.13 - Experimental Variograms and Models for TREO in the High Grade Zone .. 14-27
Figure 14.14 - Experimental Variograms and Models for TREO in the Combined
Low Grade Zone ............................................................................................ 14-28
Figure 14.15 - Experimental Variograms and Models for FMR in the High-Grade Zone .... 14-29
Figure 14.16 - Experimental Variograms and Models for FMR in the Low-Grade Zone ..... 14-30
Figure 14.17 - Typical Plan Map Showing the OreZONE.................................................... 14-32
Figure 15.1 - Ultimate Pit Design………………………………………………………………….15-5
Figure 16.1 - Pit Slope Design Sectors ................................................................................. 16-2
Figure 16.2 - Mining Phase BH1 (Starter Pit) ........................................................................ 16-4
Figure 16.3 - Ultimate Pit Extents (Phases BH4 and WT3)................................................... 16-5
Figure 16.4 - Year 1 WRF Layout........................................................................................ 16-12
